Comparability of Steroid Collision Cross Sections Using Three Different IM-HRMS Technologies: An Interplatform Study

Steroids play key roles in various biological processes and are characterized by many isomeric variants which makes their unambiguous identification challenging. Ion mobility-mass spectrometry (IM-MS) has been proposed as a suitable platform for this application, particularly using collision cross section (CCS) databases obtained from differ-ent commercial IM-MS instruments. CCS is foreseen as an ideal additional identification parameter for steroids as long-term repeatability and interlaboratory reproducibility of this measurand are excellent and matrix effects are negligible. While excellent results were demonstrated for individual IM-MS technologies, a systematic comparison of CCS derived from all major commercial IM-MS technologies has not been performed. To address this gap, a comprehensive interlabor-atory comparison of 142 CCS values derived from drift tube (DTIM-MS), traveling wave (TWIM-MS) and trapped ion mo-bility (TIM-MS) platforms using a set of 87 steroids was undertaken. Besides delivering three instrument-specific CCS databases, systematic comparisons revealed excellent interlaboratory performance for 95% of the ions with CCS biases within ±1% for TIM-MS and within ±2% for TWIM-MS with respect to DTIM-MS values. However, a small fraction of ions (<1.5 %) showed larger biases of up to 7% indicating that differences in the ion conformation sampled on different in-strument types need to be further investigated. Systematic differences between CCS derived from different IM-MS analyz-ers and implications on the applicability for non-targeted analysis are critically discussed. To the best of our knowledge this is the most comprehensive interlaboratory study comparing CCS from three different IM-MS technologies for analysis of steroids and small molecules in general.