Insights into the stability of engineered mini-proteins from their dynamic electronic properties

17 June 2022, Version 1
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.

Abstract

An understanding of protein stability requires capturing dynamic rearrangements and coupled properties over long lengthscales. Nevertheless, the extent of coupling in these systems has typically only been studied for classical degrees of freedom. To understand the potential benefit of extending such analysis to the coupling of electronic structure properties, we have carried out extensive semi-empirical quantum mechanical molecular dynamics of two Trp-cage variants. Small differences in the sequence of the two peptides lead to differences in their thermal stability that are revealed through electronic structure coupling analysis. In comparison, we find limited evidence that geometric coupling can distinguish the behavior of the two peptides. We show that Asp1 in the more stable variant shows significantly enhanced coupling to both sequence-adjacent and more sequence-distant residues. Non-nearest-neighbor couplings are stronger in the more stable variant, indicating a network of residues that help stabilize the protein. Our study highlights the complementary benefit of charge coupling analysis to interpret protein structure¬¬¬–function relationships.

Keywords

ab initio molecular dynamics
mini-proteins
Trp-cage
mutual information
charge coupling

Supplementary materials

Title
Description
Actions
Title
Supporting information PDF file
Description
Protonation states of TC5b and TC10b residues; RMSD of implicit and explicitly solvated TC5b; RMSD of implicit and explicitly solvated TC10b; SQM charge and geometric coupling for residue 1 in TC5b vs TC10b; Secondary structure analysis of SQM MD trajectories; SQM charge and geometric coupling for residue 2 in TC5b vs TC10b; SQM charge and geometric coupling for residue 4 in TC5b vs TC10b; QM charge coupling for residue 2 in TC5b vs TC10b; QM charge coupling for residue 4 in TC5b vs TC10b; Trajectory-specific SQM charge and geometric coupling for res. 1 in TC10b; 2D KDEs of charges between correlated pairs from full SQM of TC10b (PDF)
Actions

Supplementary weblinks

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.