Environmental Stability of Crystals: Why Be Greedy When You Can Be Exact?

02 June 2022, Version 1
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.

Abstract

In a recent paper in this journal (Chem. Mater. 2022, 34, 2545-2552), Twyman et al. studied the environmental stability of crystals by introducing a greedy heuristic algorithm for determining possible oxidation reactions. We show how the problem can be solved exactly, with less code and comparable computational time by reformulating it as a linear optimization for the reaction enthalpy. The enthalpy of oxidation and the oxidation products, computed by Twyman et al.’s greedy heuristic is suboptimal in 22504 of 39634 cases (56.8%), with the error in enthalpy of oxidation as large as 1.480 eV/atom. Every one of these quantitative errors also results in qualitative differences in the oxide species formed. Using our exact approach to the problem, we re-evaluate the core results from the paper by Twyman et al. We also describe a minor modification enabling calculations of oxidation free energy minima.

Keywords

reaction enthalpy
environmental stability
self-passivation
degradation

Supplementary materials

Title
Description
Actions
Title
Supporting Information for Environmental Stability of Crystals: Why Be Greedy When You Can Be Exact?
Description
Supporting Information for Environmental Stability of Crystals: Why Be Greedy When You Can Be Exact?
Actions

Supplementary weblinks

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.