Comparison of approximate intermolecular potentials for ab initio fragment calculations on medium sized N-heterocycles

18 March 2022, Version 3
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.

Abstract

The ground state intermolecular potential of bimolecular complexes of N-heterocycles is analysed for the impact of different terms of the interaction energy as provided by various, conceptually different theories. Novel combinations with several formulations of the electrostatic, Pauli repulsion, dispersion and other contributions are tested for a good performance at both short- and long-distance sides of the potential energy surface for various alignments of the pyrrole dimer as well as the cytosine-uracil complex. The integration of a DFT/CC density embedding scheme and dispersion terms from the effective fragment potential (EFP) method is found to provide very good agreement with the reference CCSD(T) potential overall, but a QM/MM approach using CHELPG atomic point charges for the electrostatic interaction augmented by EFP dispersion and Pauli repulsion contributions comes also close. Both of these schemes has the advantage of not relying on predefined force fields, rather the interaction parameters can be obtained for the system under study, therefore excellent candidates for ab initio modeling.

Supplementary materials

Title
Description
Actions
Title
Supplementary data for reproducibility purposes.
Description
Structures of the the investigated monomers and complexes, calculated CHELPG charges, employed parameters of the GAFF Force Field as well as C6 coefficients and damping parameters of the D3 correction are listed here. The effect of the E(disp)(21) + E(disp)(22) terms of SAPT are also demonstrated for Pyr - Pyr(S).
Actions

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.