Abstract
A perpetual yearn exists among computational scientists to scale-down the size of physical systems, a desire shared as well with experimentalists able to track single molecules. A question then arises whether averages observed at small systems are the same as those observed at large, or macroscopic, systems. Utilizing statistical-mechanics formulations in ensembles in which the total numbers of particles are fixed, we demonstrate that system's properties of binding reactions are not homogeneous functions. That means averages of intensive properties, such as the concentration of the bound-state, at finite-systems are different than those at large-systems. The discrepancy increases with decreasing numbers of particles, temperature, and volume. As perplexing as it may sound, despite these variations in average quantities, extracting the equilibrium constant from systems of different sizes does yield the same value. The reason is that correlations in reactants' concentrations are ought be accounted for in the expression of the equilibrium constant, being negligible at large-scale but significant at small-scale. Similar arguments pertain to the calculations of the reaction rate-constants, more specifically, the bimolecular rate of the forward reaction is related to the average of the product (and not to the product of the averages) of the reactants' concentrations. Furthermore, we derive relations aiming to predict the composition of the system only from the value of the equilibrium constant. All predictions are validated by Monte-Carlo and molecular dynamics simulations. An important significance of these findings is that the expression of the equilibrium constant at finite systems is not dictated solely by the chemical equation but requires knowledge of the elementary processes involved.
Supplementary materials
Title
Supporting Information - Binding Reactions at Finite Systems
Description
1) Comparisons with analytical/numerical methods.
2) Computational details.
3) Supplementary Figures & Tables.
4) An Alternative Derivation of the Relation between Concentrations and Fluctuations.
5) Transformations between g(r) of Systems with Different Sizes.
Actions