Cambridge Open Engage home
What is Cambridge Open Engage?
How to Submit
Browse
About
News [opens in a new tab]

Galaxy workflows for fragment-based virtual screening: a case study on the SARS-CoV-2 main protease

01 December 2021, Version 1
Working Paper
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.

Abstract

We present several workflows for protein-ligand docking and free energy calculation for use in the workflow management system Galaxy. The workflows are composed of several widely used open-source tools, including rDock and GROMACS, and can be executed on public infrastructure using either Galaxy's graphical interface or the command line. We demonstrate the utility of the workflows by running a high-throughput virtual screening of around 40000 compounds against the SARS-CoV-2 main protease, a system which has been the subject of intense study in the last year.

Keywords

fragment screening
workflows
SARS-CoV-2
computational chemistry

Supplementary materials

Title
Description
Actions
Title
Supplementary material
Description
Supplementary material
Actions

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.

Version History

Dec 01, 2021 Version 1

Metrics

4,767
487
0
Views
Downloads
Citations

License

CC logo
CC
BY logo
BY
NC logo
NC
ND logo
ND
The content is available under CC BY NC ND 4.0 [opens in a new tab]

DOI

10.26434/chemrxiv-2021-zr4xn
D O I: 10.26434/chemrxiv-2021-zr4xn [opens in a new tab]

Author’s competing interest statement

The author(s) have declared they have no conflict of interest with regard to this content

Ethics

The author(s) have declared ethics committee/IRB approval is not relevant to this content

Share