Abstract
Xylose is a major component of hemicelluloses. In this paper, its hydrogenation to xylitol in aqueous medium was
investigated with two Ru/TiO2 catalysts prepared with two commercial TiO2 supports. A strong impact of support on catalytic performances was evidenced. Ru/TiO2-R led to fast and selective conversion of xylose (100 % conversion in 2 h at 120°C with 99 % selectivity) whereas Ru/TiO2-A gave a slower and much less selective transformation (58 % conversion in 4 h at 120°C with 17 % selectivity) with the formation of several by-products. Detailed characterization of catalysts with ICP, XRD, FTIR, TEM, H2 chemisorption, N2 porosimetry, TPR and acid-base titration were performed to elucidate the role of each support.
TiO2-R has a small specific surface area with large ruthenium nanoparticles in weak interaction with TiO2 support and no acidity, whereas TiO2-A is a mesoporous material with a large specific surface area, mildly acidic, and bears small ruthenium particles in strong interaction with TiO2 support. The former was very active and selective for xylose hydrogenation to xylitol whereas the latter was less active and poorly selective. Moreover, careful analysis of reaction products also revealed that TiO2 anatase can catalyze undesired side-reactions such as xylose isomerisation to various pentoses, and therefore the
corresponding unexpected polyols (arabitol, ribitol) were produced during xylose conversion by hydrogenation. In a first approach of the kinetics, a simplified kinetic model was built to compare quantitatively intrinsic reaction rates of both catalysts. The kinetic constant for hydrogenation was 20 times higher for Ru/TiO2-R at 120°C.
Supplementary materials
Title
Electronic Supplementary Information
Description
1. Mass transfer limitations
2. Typical chromatograms of xylose hydrogenation products
3. Kinetics of sugars hydrogenation
4. Carbon balance
5. XRD diffractograms of TiO2 supports
6. N2 physisorption isotherms
7. TEM-EDX of Ru/TiO2-R catalyst
Actions