Enhancing Cysteine Chemoproteomic Coverage Through Systematic Assessment of Click Chemistry Product Fragmentation

11 October 2021, Version 1

Abstract

Mass spectrometry-based chemoproteomics has enabled functional analysis and small molecule screening at thousands of cysteine residues in parallel. Widely adopted chemoproteomic sample preparation workflows rely on the use of pan-cysteine reactive probes such as iodoacetamide alkyne combined with biotinylation via copper-catalyzed azide–alkyne cycloaddition (CuAAC) or ‘click chemistry’ for cysteine capture. Despite considerable advances in both sample preparation and analytical platforms, current techniques only sample a small fraction of all cysteines encoded in the human proteome. Extending the recently introduced labile mode of the MSFragger search engine, here we report an in-depth analysis of cysteine biotinylation via click chemistry (CBCC) reagent gas-phase fragmentation during MS/MS analysis. We find that CBCC conjugates produce both known and novel diagnostic fragments and peptide remainder ions. Among these species, we identified a candidate signature ion for CBCC peptides, the oxonium-biotin fragment ion that is generated upon fragmentation of the N(triazole)–C(alkyl) bond together with cyclization. Guided by our empirical comparison of the fragmentation patterns of five CBCC reagent combinations, we achieved enhanced coverage of cysteine labeled peptides. For larger, fragmentation-prone biotinylation reagents, implementation of labile search afforded unique PSMs and provides a roadmap for the utility of such searches in enhancing chemoproteomic peptide coverage.

Content

Supplementary materials

Supporting Information
Supporting Information
Table S1
Table S1
Table S3
Table S3
Table S4
Table S4
Table S5
Table S5

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.