Abstract
The electric field induced (EFI) bulk Chi(3) contribution to the second harmonic generation (SHG) signal from charged interfaces was discovered and applied to study the interfacial chemistry of various charged interfaces three decades ago. For both the buried fused silica/water interface and the exposed charged monolayer covered air/water interface, such bulk Chi(3) contribution was all attributed to the Chi(3) term of the polarized water molecules near the charged interfaces. The puzzling experimental observation of the more than one-order of magnitude difference of the EFISHG intensity between the fully charged silica/water interface and the charged molecular covered air/water interface was generally overlooked in the EFISHG literature. Nevertheless, this significant signal difference suggests additional source for the Chi(3) contribution at the fully charged silica/water interface other than the polarized water molecules as in the case of charged monolayer covered air/water interface. In this report, we re-examine the treatment of the Chi(3) mechanism at the charged silica/water interface by including the contributions from the bulk silica using proper boundary condition and image charge distributions for the change screening effects inside bulk silica phase. We show that the Chi(3) contribution from the bulk silica is in similar form as that of the aqueous bulk phase, and it is with more than one-order of magnitude and with opposite sign. The treatment reported here can be extended to other charged interfaces.