Bias corrections for speciated and source-resolved PM2.5 chemical transport model simulations using a geographically weighted regression

01 September 2021, Version 1
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.

Abstract

The ability to provide speciated and source-resolved PM2.5 estimates make chemical transport models a potentially valuable tool for exposure assessments. However, epidemiological studies often require unbiased estimates, which can be challenging for chemical transport models. We use geographically weighted regression to predict and correct the bias in source-resolved PM2.5 species (elemental carbon, organic aerosol, ammonium, nitrate, and sulfate) across the continental U.S. for 2001 and 2010. The regression models are trained using speciated ground-level monitors from the CSN and IMPROVE networks. A 10-fold cross-validation shows minimal bias across all simulated PM2.5 species (0 – 3%) and improved agreement with ground-level monitors (R2 = 0.53 – 0.97). Corrections also improve the agreement between simulated and observed species mixtures on a fractional basis. The source-resolved exposure estimates developed in this study are suitable for use in health analyses of PM2.5 toxicity.

Keywords

air quality
fine particulate matter

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.