Enhancing Electrochemical Carbon Dioxide Reduction by Polymer-Encapsulated Cobalt Phthalocyanine through Incorporation of Graphite Powder

01 September 2021, Version 1
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.

Abstract

Cobalt phthalocyanine (CoPc) has been extensively studied as a catalyst for the electrochemical reduction of CO2 to value-added products. Previous studies have shown that CoPc is a competent and efficient catalyst when immobilized onto carbon-based electrodes using a polymer binder, especially when immobilized with a graphitic carbon powder support to increase charge transport. In this study, we systematically explore the influence of incorporating graphite powder (GP) into a polymer-encapsulated CoPc on the system’s activity for the electrochemical reduction of CO2. We report a protocol for incorporating GP into CoPc/polymer/GP catalyst films that facilitates physisorption of CoPc to GP, leading to increased activity for CO2 reduction. We show that the activity for CO2 reduction increases with GP loading at low GP loadings, but at sufficiently high GP loadings the activity plateaus as charge transfer is sufficiently fast to no longer be rate limiting. We also demonstrate that axial coordination is still important even in the presence of GP, suggesting that CoPc does not fully coordinate to heteroatoms on the GP surface. We develop a set of optimized conditions under which the CoPc/polymer/GP catalyst systems reduce CO2 with higher activity and similar selectivity to previously reported CoPc/polymer films on edge-plane graphite electrodes. The procedures outlined in this study will be used in future studies to optimize catalyst, polymer, and carbon support loadings for other polymer-catalyst composite systems for electrocatalytic transformations.

Supplementary materials

Title
Description
Actions
Title
Supporting Information
Description
Additional details regarding catalyst and polymer loading and preparation conditions, tables with activity measurements, faradaic efficiency results, representative RDE-CAs, and comparison between centrifuged and non-centrifuged CoPc-P4VP/GP/GCE systems.
Actions

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.