Facet-Dependent Stability of Near-Surface Oxygen Vacancies and Excess Charge Localization at CeO2 Surfaces

01 September 2021, Version 1
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.


To study the dependence of the relative stability of surface (VA) and subsurface (VB) oxygen vacancies with the crystal facet of CeO2, the reduced (100), (110) and (111) surfaces, with two different concentrations of vacancies, were investigated by means of density functional theory (DFT+U) calculations. The results show that the trend in the near-surface vacancy formation energies for comparable vacancy spacings, i.e. (110) < (100) < (111), does not follow that in the surface stability of the facets, i.e. (111) < (110) < (100). The results also revealed that the preference of vacancies for surface or subsurface sites, as well as the preferred location of the associated Ce3+ polarons, are facet and concentration-dependent. At the higher vacancy concentration, the VA is more stable than the VB at the (110) facet whereas, at the (111), it is the other way around, and at the (100) facet, both the VA and the VB have similar stability. The stability of the VA vacancies, compared to that of the VB, is accentuated as the concentration decreases. Nearest neighbor polarons to the vacant sites are only observed for the less densely packed (110) and (100) facets. These findings are rationalized in terms of the packing density of the facets, the lattice relaxation effects induced by vacancy formation and the localization of the excess charge, and the repulsive Ce3+ - Ce3+ interactions.


cerium oxide surfaces
facet-dependent stability
oxygen vacancies
lattice relaxations
excess charge localization

Supplementary materials

Supporting Information Facet-Dependent Stability of Near-Surface Oxygen Vacancies and Excess Charge Localization at CeO2 Surfaces
All structures are listed with their relevant energies and parameters that support our findings and conclusions.


Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.