Aliovalent doping response and impact on ionic conductivity in the antiperovskite solid electrolyte Li3OCl

13 August 2021, Version 1
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.


Aliovalent doping of solid electrolytes with the intention of increase the concentration of charge carrying mobile defects is a common strategy for enhancing their ionic conductivities. For the antiperovskite lithium-ion solid electrolyte Li3OCl, both supervalent (donor) and subvalent (acceptor) doping schemes have previously been proposed. The effectiveness of these doping schemes depends on two conditions: first, that aliovalent doping promotes the formation of mobile lithium vacancies or interstitials rather than competing immobile defects; and second, that any increase in lithium defect concentration gives a corresponding increase in ionic conductivity. To evaluate the effectiveness of aliovalent doping in Li3OCl, we have performed a hybrid density-functional theory study of the defect chemistry of Li3OCl and the response to supervalent and subvalent doping. In nominally stoichiometric Li3OCl the dominant native defects are predicted to be VLi, OCl, and VCl. Supervalent doping increases VLi and OCl concentrations, with the preferentially formed defect species dependent on synthesis conditions. Subvalent doping increases the concentration of VCl more than the concentration of Lii under all accessible synthesis conditions. While supervalent doping is predicted to be effective at increasing ionic conductivity, particularly under Li-poor synthesis conditions, subvalent doping is predicted to decrease room-temperature ionic conductivities at low-to-moderate doping levels. This effect is due to a reduction in the number of lithium vacancies formed during synthesis, and increased [VLi + Lii] Frenkel-pair recombination upon cooling to room temperature. The strongly asymmetric doping response of Li3OCl with respect to supervalent versus subvalent doping is explained as a consequence of the low [VLi + VCl] Schottky pair formation energy, suggesting analogous behaviour should be expected in other Schottky-disordered solid electrolytes.


aliovalent doping
oping response
doping-response efficiency
Frenkel-pair recombination
Schottky disorder
solid electrolytes

Supplementary materials

table of contents image
visual abstract for the associated preprint


Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.