Lifting the discrepancy between experimental results and the theoretical predictions for the catalytic activity of RuO2 (110) towards Oxygen Evolution Reaction

29 June 2021, Version 1
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.

Abstract

Developing new efficient catalyst materials for the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) is essential for widespread proton exchange membrane water electrolyzer use. Both RuO2 (110) and IrO2 (110) have been shown to be highly active OER catalysts, however DFT predictions have been unable to explain the high activity of RuO2. We propose that this discrepancy is due to RuO2 utilizing a different reaction pathway, as compared to the conventional IrO2 pathway. This hypothesis is supported by comparisons between experimental data, DFT data and the proposed reaction model. Furthermore, our findings indicate that the reaction pathway utilized by RuO2 (110) might be pH dependent, following the conventional pathway at high pH.

Keywords

Electrocatalysis
Oxygen evolution reaction
IrO2
RuO2
Oxide
OER
Electrolyzer
Proton exchange membrane
Computational
DFT
Density functional theory

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.