“Refereeing Template”: A Guide to Writing an Effective Peer Review

08 June 2021, Version 1
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.


We offer here a “Refereeing Template” to guide a more constructive and systematic peer review process. This template provides the following algorithm for constructing a peer review: (i) list the key claims of the manuscript; (ii) determine if the data (and interpretations of the data) support said claims; and, only as a last step, (iii) offer an opinion as to whether the supported claims deserve publication in the targeted journal. The Refereeing Template is designed to improve the quality and clarity of reviews by emphasizing claims, arguments backed by supporting evidence, as the basis for evaluating the quality of a manuscript, and translating that evaluation into an assessment of impact and significance.


Peer review
Refereeing Template


Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.