Contrasting Effects of Inhibitors Li+ and Be2+ on Catalytic Cycle of Glycogen Synthase Kinase-3β

24 May 2021, Version 1
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.

Abstract

Ionic lithium shows rare effectiveness for treating bipolar disorder and is a promising drug for treating neurodegenerative diseases. Unfortunately, lithium suffers from significant drawbacks as a drug, mainly a narrow therapeutic window. Among the different targets of lithium, glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK-3β) might be the one responsible for its therapeutic effects. Developing alternative, selective inhibitors of this kinase could avoid lithium side effects, but efforts to do so have met little success so far. A detailed, atomistic understanding of Li+ inhibition and a more detailed understanding of the phosphorylation reaction GSK-3β catalyzes would therefore facilitate the development of new drugs. In this study, we use extensive sampling of catalytic states with our mixed quantum-classical dynamics method QM/DMD and binding affinities from a competitive metal affinity (CMA) approach to fill out the atomic scale picture of Li+ GSK-3β inhibition. We compare Li+ action with Be2+, another known inhibitor, and find our results in agreement with in-vitro kinetics studies. Ultimately, our simulations show that Li+ inhibition is driven primarily by directly decreasing the reaction rate of the phosphorylation step, rather than reducing catalytic turnover through tight binding to different GSK-3β states like Be2+ inhibition. The effect of these metals derive from electrostatic differences and especially their smaller atomic radii compared to the native Mg2+ and thus provides insight for the development of GSK-3β inhibitors based on other paradigms.

Keywords

GSK-3β
inhibitor activity
lithium
beryllium
Chemical Calculations
QM/DMD
Molecular Dynamics

Supplementary materials

Title
Description
Actions
Title
Supporting Information
Description
Actions

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.