Impacts of Modifiable Factors on Ambient Air Pollution: A Case Study of COVID-19 Shutdowns


Modifiable sources of air pollution such as traffic, cooking, and electricity generation emissions can be modulated either by changing activity levels or source intensity. Although air pollution regulations typically target reducing emission factors rather than altering activity, the COVID-19 related closures offered a novel opportunity to observe and quantify the impact of activity levels of modifiable factors on ambient air pollution in real-time. We use data from a network of twenty-seven low-cost Real-time Affordable Multi-Pollutant (RAMP) sensor packages deployed throughout urban and suburban Pittsburgh along with data from EPA regulatory monitors. The RAMP locations were divided into four site groups based on land use (High Traffic, Urban Residential, Suburban Residential, and Industrial). Concentrations of PM2.5, CO, and NO2 following the COVID-related closures at each site group were compared to measurements from “business as usual” periods in March 2019 and 2020. Overall, PM2.5 concentrations decreased across the domain by 3 μg/m3. Intra-day variabilities of the pollutants were computed to attribute pollutant enhancements to specific emission sources (i.e. traffic and industrial emissions). There was no significant change in the industrial related intra-day variability of PM2.5 at the Industrial sites following the COVID-related closures. The morning rush hour induced CO and NO2 concentrations at the High Traffic sites were reduced by 57% and 43%, respectively, which is consistent with the observed reduction in commuter traffic (~50%). The morning rush hour PM2.5 enhancement from traffic emissions fell from ~1.5 μg/m3 to ~0 μg/m3 across all site groups. This translates to a reduction of 0.125 μg/m3 in the daily average PM2.5 concentration. If PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) are tightened these calculations shed light on to what extent reductions in traffic related emissions are able to aid in meeting more stringent regulations.

Version notes

One of the author's names was inconsistent I received a message saying the preprint was declined because the submission said "Rose Eilenberg in preprint file vs. Sarah Eilenberg in metadata". For consistency I have corrected this author's name to S. Rose Eilenberg in both the preprint text and the form. I hope that this rectifies the problem.