The Missing Label Problem: Addressing False Assumptions Improves Ligand-Based Virtual Screening

04 September 2019, Version 1
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.

Abstract

Ligand-based virtual screening (LBVS) uses machine readable representations of chemicals to learn a mapping function that can predict binding interactions with protein labels. Because it is highly scalable it is increasingly used in drug development in academic and pharmaceutical contexts. We have identified assumptions commonly used in LBVS that are false, which collectively can be described as the missing label problem. Firstly, many of the binding interactions in the bioactivity databases typically used to train LBVS models have never been tested before, but the absence of a label is interpreted by most models as a true negative. Secondly, many proteins have multiple binding sites with unrelated shapes but the associated ligands are grouped together under the one protein label. These assumptions frustrate the ability of the model to learn a correct mapping function. Here we use statistical techniques to predict values for the missing labels and binding sites and show how this improves the ability of LBVS models to rank ligands correctly. In the process we introduce a new technique for removing bias during model evaluation based on data blocking from experimental design theory. All data and code for analysis and generating figures is publicly available on github (https://github.com/ljmartin/Missing_label_problem).

Keywords

Ligand based virtual screening
multilabel learning
Computational
Computational Chemistry
multilabel
learning
virtual screening

Supplementary materials

Title
Description
Actions
Title
Supplementary Information
Description
Actions

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.