Energy vs. Entropy in Superlattices of Ligand-Covered Nanoparticles

31 July 2019, Version 1
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.


Nanoparticles covered with short ligands tend to self-assemble into face-centered cubic (fcc) superlattices, while nanoparticles with longer ligands preferentially form body-centered cubic (bcc) superlattices. The thermodynamic driving forces for these structures are not fully understood and conflicting theories have been proposed. In this paper, we systematically study the thermodynamic stability of fcc and bcc superlattices as a function of ligand length, core size, and ligand coverage with a coarse-grained molecular model. Our simulations reveal that bcc superlattices are stabilized via two fundamentally different mechanisms, depending on ligand length. For shorter ligands, the bcc superlattice has a lower potential energy than fcc, due to additional interactions between ligands on next-nearest neighbors in the superlattice. For longer ligands, the bcc superlattice is stabilized due to a larger configurational entropy of ligands.


molecular simulation

Supplementary materials



Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.