These are preliminary reports that have not been peer-reviewed. They should not be regarded as conclusive, guide clinical practice/health-related behavior, or be reported in news media as established information. For more information, please see our FAQs.
Main.pdf (1.05 MB)

From “inverted” to “superdirect“ bonds: a general concept connecting substituent angles with sigma bond strengths. The case of the CC bonds in hydrocarbons.

revised on 15.03.2021, 19:56 and posted on 16.03.2021, 10:10 by Rubén Laplaza, Julia Contreras-García, Franck Fuster, François Volatron, Patrick Chaquin
The C-C dissociation energy with respect to geometry frozen fragments (BE) has been calculated for C2H6 as a function of  = H-C-C angles. BE decreases rapidly when  decreases from its equilibrium value to yield the so-called “inverted bonds” for  < 90°; on the contrary BE increases
when  increases to yield somehow “superdirect” bonds, following a sigmoidal variation. The central bond in Si2H6, Ge2H6 and N 2H4 as well as the C-H bond in CH3-H behaves similarly. The concept of “invertedness”/”directedness” is generalized to any CC sigma bond in hydrocarbons and characterized by the mean angle value <> of substituents. Using dynamic orbital forces (DOF) as indices, the intrinsic  bond energies are studied as a function of <> for formally single bonds in a
panel of 22 molecules. This energy decreases from the strongest “superdirect” bonds in butadiyne, (<> = 180°) or tetrahedrylacetylene to the weakest “inverted bond” in cyclobutene, tetrahedrane, bicyclobutane and [1.1.1]propellane (<> = 60°), according to a sigmoidal variation. The <> parameter appears as a crude, but straightforward and robust, index of strain in cyclic molecules. Sigma bonds in multiple bonds of a panel of 11 molecules have most of time <> values less than 90°
and are significantly weaker than standard single bonds. Thus they can be considered as formally inverted or near inverted.


Email Address of Submitting Author





ORCID For Submitting Author

Declaration of Conflict of Interest

No conflict of interest.

Version Notes

First draft.