Using Bayesian Model Selection to Advise Neutron Reflectometry Analysis from Langmuir-Blodgett Monolayers
Preprints are manuscripts made publicly available before they have been submitted for formal peer review and publication. They might contain new research findings or data. Preprints can be a draft or final version of an author's research but must not have been accepted for publication at the time of submission.
that should be used to rationalise relflectometry data. In this work, we outline a robust and generic framework for the determination of the evidence for a particular model given experimental data, by
applying Bayesian logic. We apply this framework to the study of Langmuir-Blodgett monolayers by considering three possible analytical models from a recently published investigation [Campbell et al., J. Colloid Interface Sci, 2018, 531, 98]. From this, we can determine which model has the most evidence given the experimental data, and show the effect that different isotopic contrasts of neutron reflectometry will have on this. We believe that this general framework could become an important component of neutron and X-ray reflectometry data analysis, and hope others more regularly consider the relative evidence for their analytical models.