ChemRxiv
These are preliminary reports that have not been peer-reviewed. They should not be regarded as conclusive, guide clinical practice/health-related behavior, or be reported in news media as established information. For more information, please see our FAQs.
Martin et al Dec 20 preprint.pdf (1.53 MB)

Rapid Characterisation of Suspensions for Waste Treatment and Resource Recovery

preprint
submitted on 16.12.2020, 16:35 and posted on 18.12.2020, 08:47 by Joshua Wardrop, Sara J. Baldock, ian coote, Rachael Demaine, Peter R. Fielden, Alastair Martin
A simple device for the conduct of stepped pressure filtration measurements is described together with methods for making the empirical measurements and interpreting the data obtained. The data interpretation method applies a multi-step systematic approach, with each step supported by statistical justification, to characterise: filter cake particle stress, filtration diffusivity and cake hydraulic resistivity from a single stepped pressure experiment. The methods enable different flocculant materials to be more rapidly and more appropriately screened than conventional jar tests and large scale filtration trials. The methods are applied to the characterisation of a paint residue treated with aluminium sulphate and “PolyClay”.
The work shows that the addition of “PolyClay” as a filter aide reduces the hydraulic resistivity at lower solids concentrations but increases it at higher concentrations whilst simultaneously increasing the particle stress. Together these have a combined deleterious effect on the time and energy required to dewater the residues to high solids concentration by filtration. The results also show that a significant change in suspension behaviour occurs between the “PolyClay” doses of 140 mg l-1 and 660 mg l-1 and that further changes up to “PolyClay” doses of 1600 mg l-1 are more modest. The results indicate the existence an opportunity to reduce “PolyClay” dose into a range between 10% and 50% of current practice. In addition the results provide evidence that alternative, centrifuge based, technology is worthy of investigation.

Funding

Innovate, Knowledge Transfer Partnership

History

Email Address of Submitting Author

a.martin1@lancaster.ac.uk

Institution

Lancaster University

Country

United Kingdom

ORCID For Submitting Author

0000-0002-3558-7273

Declaration of Conflict of Interest

No conflicts of interest

Version Notes

Rev. 0 (original)

Exports