These are preliminary reports that have not been peer-reviewed. They should not be regarded as conclusive, guide clinical practice/health-related behavior, or be reported in news media as established information. For more information, please see our FAQs.
Preprints are manuscripts made publicly available before they have been submitted for formal peer review and publication. They might contain new research findings or data. Preprints can be a draft or final version of an author's research but must not have been accepted for publication at the time of submission.
This work attempts to provide a clear picture on the relative quality of different Density Functional Approximations through the use of Quantum Chemical Topology on molecular electronic densities. In particular, two simple yet ever-important systems are studied, the N2 and CO molecules. Our results exemplify how real-space descriptors can clearly assess the calculated electronic density of a molecular system, avoiding unwanted error compensation present in simplified statistical metrics. Errors in ``well'' built functionals are shown to be concentrated in chemically meaningful regions of space, and hence they are predictable. Conversely, strongly parametrized functionals show isotropic errors that cannot be traced back to chemical transferable units. Moreover, we will show that energetic corrections are mapped back into improvements in the density in chemically meaningful regions. These results point at the relevance of real-space perspectives when parametrizing or assessing energy and density errors.