ChemRxiv
These are preliminary reports that have not been peer-reviewed. They should not be regarded as conclusive, guide clinical practice/health-related behavior, or be reported in news media as established information. For more information, please see our FAQs.
1/1
0/0

Is There a Gender Gap in Chemical Sciences Scholarly Communication?

preprint
submitted on 31.10.2019 and posted on 06.11.2019 by Aileen Day, Peter Corbett, John Boyle

The Royal Society of Chemistry is committed to investigating and addressing the barriers and biases which face women in the chemical sciences. The cornerstone of this is a thorough analysis of data regarding submissions, review and citations for Royal Society of Chemistry journals from January 2014 until July 2018, since the number and impact of publications and citations are an important factor when seeking research funding and for the progression of academic career. We have applied standard statistical techniques to multiple data sources to perform this analysis, and have investigated whether interactions between variables are significant in affecting various outcomes (author gender; reviewer gender; reviewer recommendations and submission outcome) in addition to considering variables individually. By considering several different data sources, we found that a baseline of approximately a third of chemistry researchers are female overall, although this differs considerably with Chemistry sub-discipline. Rather than one dominant bias effect, we observe complex interactions and a gradual trickle-down decrease in this female percentage through the publishing process and each of these female percentages is less than the last: authors of submissions; authors of RSC submissions which are not rejected without peer review; authors of accepted RSC publications; authors of cited articles. The success rate for female authors to progress through each of these publishing stages is lower than that for male authors. There is a decreasing female percentage when progressing through from first authors to corresponding authors to reviewers, reflecting the decreasing female percentage with seniority in Chemistry research observed in the “Diversity landscape of the chemical sciences” report1. Highlights and actions from this analysis form the basis of an accompanying report to be released from the Royal Society of Chemistry.

History

Email Address of Submitting Author

daya@rsc.org

Institution

Royal Society of Chemistry

Country

United Kingdom

ORCID For Submitting Author

0000-0003-2397-1996

Declaration of Conflict of Interest

no conflict of interest

Version Notes

Second revision of manuscript submitted to chemical science for review

Exports

Logo branding

Exports