These are preliminary reports that have not been peer-reviewed. They should not be regarded as conclusive, guide clinical practice/health-related behavior, or be reported in news media as established information. For more information, please see our FAQs.
Article + SI.pdf (4.69 MB)

Increasing the Cytotoxicity of Ru(II) Polypyridyl Complexes by Tuning the Electronic Structure of Dioxo Ligands

submitted on 10.11.2019 and posted on 20.11.2019 by Anna Notaro, Marta Jakubaszek, Nils Rotthowe, Federica Maschietto, Patrick Felder, Bruno Goud, Mickaël Tharaud, Ilaria Ciofini, Fethi Bedioui, Rainer F. Winter, Gilles Gasser
Due to the great potential expressed by an anticancer drug candidate previously reported by our group, namely Ru-sq ([Ru(DIP)2(sq)](PF6) (DIP: 4,7-diphenyl-1,10-phenanthroline, sq: semiquinonate ligand), we describe in this work a structure-activity relationship (SAR) that involves a broader range of derivatives resulting from the coordination of different catecholate-like dioxoligands to the same Ru(DIP)2 core. More in detail, we chose catechols carrying either electron-donating or electronwithdrawing groups EDG or EWG and investigated the physico-chemical and biological properties of their complexes. Several pieces of experimental evidences demonstrated that the coordination of catechols bearing EDGs led to deep red positively charged complexes 1–4 in which the preferred oxidation state of the dioxoligand is the uninegatively charged semiquinonate. Complexes 5 and 6, on the other hand, are blue/violet neutral complexes which carry an EWG substituted dinegatively charged catecholate ligand. The biological investigation of complexes 1–6 led to the conclusion that the difference in their physico-chemical properties has a strong impact on their biological activity. Thus, complexes 1–4 expressed much higher cytotoxicities than complexes 5 and 6. Complex 1 constitutes the most promising compound of the series and was selected for a more in-depth biological investigation. Apart from its remarkably high cytotoxicity (IC50 = 0.07–0.7 μM in different cancerous cell lines) complex 1 was taken up by HeLa cells very efficiently by a passive transportation mechanism. Moreover, its moderate accumulation in several cellular compartments (i.e. nucleus, lysosomes, mitochondria and cytoplasm) is extremely advantageous in the search of a potential drug with multiple modes of action. Further DNA metalation and metabolic studies pointed to the direct interaction of complex 1 with DNA and to the severe impairment of the mitochondrial function. Multiple targets, together with its outstanding cytotoxicity, make complex 1 a valuable candidate in the field of chemotherapy research.


Email Address of Submitting Author


Chimie ParisTech, PSL University, CNRS, Institute of Chemistry for Life and Health Sciences



ORCID For Submitting Author


Declaration of Conflict of Interest

No Conflict of Interest

Version Notes

Not available.


Logo branding