ChemRxiv
These are preliminary reports that have not been peer-reviewed. They should not be regarded as conclusive, guide clinical practice/health-related behavior, or be reported in news media as established information. For more information, please see our FAQs.
1/1
4 files
0/0

Systematic comparison of Amber and Rosetta energy functions for protein structure evaluation.

preprint
revised on 04.04.2018 and posted on 04.04.2018 by Aliza Rubenstein, Kristin Blacklock, Hai Nguyen, David Case, Sagar Khare

An accurate energy function is an essential component of biomolecular structural modeling and design. The comparison of differently derived energy functions enables analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of each energy function, and provides independent benchmarks for evaluating improvements within a given energy function. We compared the molecular mechanics Amber empirical energy function to two versions of the Rosetta energy function (talaris2014 and REF2015) in decoy discrimination and loop modeling tests. Both Rosetta's talaris2014 and Amber's ff14SBonlySC energy functions performed well in scoring the native state as the lowest energy conformation in many cases. In 24/150 cases with Rosetta, and in 2/150 cases using Amber, a false minimum is found that is absent in the alternative landscape. In 21/150 cases, both energy function-generated landscapes featured false minima. The newest version of the Rosetta energy function, REF2015, which has more physically-derived terms than talaris2014, performs significantly better, highlighting the improvements made to the Rosetta scoring approach. To take advantage of the semi-orthogonal nature of these energy functions, we developed a Pareto optimization approach that combines Amber and Rosetta energy landscapes to predict the most near-native model for a given protein. This algorithm improves upon predictions from either energy function in isolation, and should aid in model selection for structure prediction and loop modeling tasks.

History

Email Address of Submitting Author

sagar.khare@rutgers.edu

Institution

Rutgers University

Country

USA

ORCID For Submitting Author

0000-0002-2255-0543

Declaration of Conflict of Interest

None

Exports

Read the published paper

in Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation

Logo branding

Exports