Evaluation of the IP-EOMCCSD Method for Estimating Experimental Ionization Potentials Using 53 Medium Sized Molecules

11 December 2018, Version 1
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.

Abstract

Vertical ionization potentials (IPs) computed using the IP-EOMCCSD method are reported for 53 medium sized molecules (6 – 32 atoms) and compared with average experimental vertical IPs. The calculations are practical on a modest computational cluster and yield good agreement with experimental values using the aug-cc-pVDZ basis set, with an average deviation from the experimental IP of −0.04 eV. The accuracy of IP computations appears to be approaching the point where possible systematic experimental errors can be identified. Although good extrapolations to the complete basis set limit for the IP are achievable using just the aug-cc-pVDZ and aug-cc-pVTZ basis sets, deviations of the extrapolation from experimental values suggest that inclusion of higher order "triples" may make the computational method more broadly applicable. Examination of experimental spectra for ethylene, E-2-butene, 2,5-dihydrofuran and pyrrole reinforces the observations of Davidson and Jarzęcki1 that experimental vertical IPs are usually extracted from experimental data in a manner that does not account for band asymmetries, making direct comparison to computations difficult. Despite the good agreement with experiment when using the aug-cc-pVDZ basis set, for the molecules investigated most of these reported experimental IPs are below the actual value, likely by no more than 0.4 eV. This set of 53 molecules is recommended as a benchmark comparison set for computational and experimental IP results.

Keywords

ionization potentials
comparison of computations and experiment

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.